Intimidating confidence

Behavioral theorists often see threatening behaviours as a consequence of being threatened by others, including parents, authority figures, playmates and siblings."Use of force is justified when a person reasonably believes that it is necessary for the defense of oneself or another against the immediate use of unlawful force." Intimidation may be employed consciously or unconsciously, and a percentage of people who employ it consciously may do so as the result of selfishly rationalized notions of its appropriation, utility or self-empowerment.You need to snarl, because you’re letting your inner animal out of its cage and it’s about to take someone’s head off. Sure, no list of intimidating factors would be complete without the simple truth of a person’s appearance.

By simply completing the action you should be boosting your courage and confidence and reaffirming your self-belief. How would you feel if you were about to physically engage an opponent and their physical demeanor said, “I want to destroy you as soon as possible” and then they snarled like a rabid wolverine, just waiting to sink their teeth into you. Maybe I’m in over my head.”Will laughing at someone who wants to fight you always help you avoid a fight? Also keep in mind, you can’t laugh like a school girl, or snarl like a Chihuahua, before a fight, just because Logical Spiritualism Intimidation tactics recommends it. You will look like a fool and you’ll actually lose confidence, which is a gain for your opponent. You need to laugh, because it’s amusing someone would have the audacity to fight you and only you know how badly you’re about to hurt that person.Logical Spiritualism Intimidation tactics are only intended for use when violence and direct physical conflict cannot be avoided.All of Logical Spiritualism’s violent tactics are used for the defense of life, but Logical Spiritualists realize that the best defense is often a strong offense.Intimidation (also called cowing) is intentional behavior that "would cause a person of ordinary sensibilities" to fear injury or harm.It is not necessary to prove that the behavior was so violent as to cause mean terror or that the victim was actually frightened.

Leave a Reply